ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE, CULTURAL DIPLOMACY AND THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20544/uklop.2026.638Keywords:
Cultural Diplomacy, Archaeological Heritage, Interdisciplinarity, Sustainable Development, International RelationsAbstract
Introduction: This paper addresses the critical reevaluation of cultural diplomacy's role in 21st-century international relations. In an era where the effectiveness of soft power tools is often questioned, this study aims to explore a novel methodological approach by examining the intersection of archaeological heritage and cultural diplomacy to foster sustainable development in global affairs.
Methods: The research employs a qualitative analysis of existing literature and specific case studies in the field of heritage diplomacy. It examines the mechanisms through which archaeological sites, artefacts, and cultural narratives are integrated into diplomatic strategies to promote intercultural dialogue and sustainable practices.
Results: The analysis demonstrates that archaeological heritage, due to its profound impact on identity formation and cultural narratives, functions as a crucial component of the "software" of modern societies. The findings indicate its significant potential as a soft power tool to enhance international relations by contributing to peacebuilding, preserving cultural diversity, stimulating responsible tourism, and supporting economic growth through heritage preservation.
Discussion: The study concludes that integrating archaeological heritage with cultural diplomacy strategies offers a powerful means to advance Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) while strengthening political and economic ties. The results underscore the broader applicability of heritage diplomacy in global peace and cooperation efforts. The paper also discusses the inherent challenges of leveraging complex cultural elements and suggests areas for further research into the practical implementation of these interdisciplinary strategies.
Downloads
References
1. Robert H. Jackson (2005), Classical and modern thought on international relations: from anarchy to cosmopolis, Palgrave MacMillan, New York, N.Y., USA.
2. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press. This book lays the groundwork for structuration theory and introduces ideas foundational to ontological security.
3. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press. This is the seminal work where Giddens develops his full theory of ontological security.
4. Giddens, A. (1994). "Living in a Post-Traditional Society". In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition, and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford University Press.
5. Huysmans, Jef (1998) "Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier", European Journal of International Relations, 4:2, 226-255.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004002004
6. Kinnvall, Catarina (2004) "Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security", Political Psychology, 25:5, 741-767.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x
7. Mitzen, Jennifer (2006) "Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma", European Journal of International Relations, 12:3, 341-370.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346
8. Steele, Brent J. (2005) "Ontological Security and the Power of Self-Identity: British Neutrality and the American Civil War", Review of International Studies, 31:3, 519-540
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006613
9. Steele, Brent J. (2008) Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State, London: Routledge.
10. Solomon, Ty (2018) "Ontological security, circulations of affect, and the Arab Spring", Journal of International Relations and Development, 21:4, 934-958.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0089-x
11. Dıaz-Andreu, Margarita (2007) A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology - Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199217175.001.0001
12. Tevdovski, Ljuben (2024), "Globalization, Ancient Cosmopolitanism and the Western Bollywood", In: Lennart W. Kruijer, Miguel John Versluys, Ian Lilley (eds.), Rooted Cosmopolitanism, Heritage and the Question of Belonging - Archaeological and Anthropological perspectives, Routledge, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003348740-5
13. Robertson, Roland. 1995. "Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity". In Mike Featherstone, Scott Lash, and Roland Robertson (eds) Global Modernities. 25-44. London: Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250563.n2
14. Martin Pitts, Miguel John Versluys (2014), Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture, Cambridge University Press.
