AI IN LITERATURE TEACHING: EXPLORING THE TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL OF COMMERCIAL AI MODELS

Authors

  • Marija Stojanoska Author
  • Elena Shalevska Faculty of Education – Bitola, University “St. Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20544/uklop.2026.636

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), ChatGPT, Pedagogical Stylistics, AI in Education

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has completely transformed our world, fundamentally changing many areas of our daily lives. While natural language processing (NLP) technologies have become part of our day-to-day live, one of the sectors most significantly affected appears to be education. However, one area that remains underexplored is AI in pedagogical stylistics – i.e., the practical use of AI models in teaching literature within the English language classroom.

Methods: Recognizing a research gap, this qualitative paper explores how teachers can incorporate AI into pre-, during-, and post-reading activities. Drawing on existing literature and personal experience with AI use, the study proposes practical applications and activity designs, with a focus on instructional integration of AI.

Results: The paper proposes a series of practical AI-based activities designed to strengthen students’ EFL (English as a Foreign Language) skills while leveraging the immense potential of these technologies in language and literature education.

Discussion: By addressing the gap in AI’s role in pedagogical stylistics, the paper emphasizes AI’s potential to improve engagement, comprehension, and critical thinking in literature-based EFL instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), p.167-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2

2. Ayman, S. E., Abou El-Seoud, S., et al. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on student learning/performing. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372481501_The_Impact_of_ChatGPT_on_Student_Learningperforming on 31.10.24.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4532913

3. Basic, Z., Banovac, A., Kružić, I., & Jerković, I. (2023). ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students' essays. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02269-7.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02269-7

4. Betti, J. M. (2021). Stylistics. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355586975_Stylistics on 4.12.24

5. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (Eds.) (2008). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199161

6. Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics 21(4): 553-571.

https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.553

7. British Council. (2015). Teaching Reading and Writing. Retrieved from: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/RW3_Preparing%20to%20read.pdf on 10.12.24.

8. Brumfit, C. J., & Carter, R. A. (1986). Literature and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

9. Burke, M., Csabi, S. et al. (eds.) (2012). Pedagogical Stylistics: Current Trends in Language, Literature and ELT. Bloomsbury.

10. Burke, M. (2010). Why care about Pedagogical Stylistics? Language and Literature, 19(1), p.7-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009356805.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009356805

11. Canosa, X. A. (2023). AI in literature: interacting with a novel. Innovative Teaching Practice (ITP) prepared for the 16th ASEF Classroom Network Conference: Leading Change: Digital Transformation of Education in the Era of AI in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

12. Carter, R., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching Literature. Longman.

13. Chen, I-Chen. 2018. Incorporating task-based learning in an extensive reading programme. ELT Journal 72 (4): 405-414.

https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy008

14. Clark, U. (2007). Discourse Stylistics and Detective Fiction: A Case Study. In: Watson, G., Zyngier, S. (eds) Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners. Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624856_6.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624856_6

15. Collie, J. & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the Language Classroom. Cambridge Handbooks for Language Teachers.

16. Crawford, A., Saul, E. W., Mathews, S., & Makinster, J. (2005). Teaching and learning strategies for the thinking classroom. Alliance for Social Dialogue.

17. Daniels, H., & Zemelman, S. (2004). Subjects matter: Every teacher's guide to content-area reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Retrieved from: http://termaat.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/81519908/Subjects%20Matter%20chapter1%20.pdf on 10.12.24.

18. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2009). Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension. Journal of Education, 189(1-2), 107-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-208

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-208

19. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

20. Fogal, G. G. (2015). Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign language and second language contexts: A synthesis of empirical research. Language and Literature, 24(1), 54-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014555450.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014555450

21. Frantzen, D. (2001). Rethinking foreign language literature: Towards an integration of literature and language at all levels. In Scott, V. M. & Tucker, H. (Eds.). SLA and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues. Issues in language program direction: A series of annual volumes. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

22. Freeman, D. (1981). Essays in Modern Stylistics. Routledge

23. Galperin, I. R. (1977). Stylistics.. Moscow: Higher School President

24. Gardner, P. S. (2005). New directions: Reading, writing, and critical thinking (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

25. Gheni, A. A. (2020). Teaching EFL students poetic texts by applying pedagogical stylistics approach. Al-Adab Journal, 133, 61-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i133.868.

https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i133.868

26. Hall, G. (2005). Literature in Language Education. Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502727

27. Harding, T., & Whitehead, D. (2016). Analyzing data in qualitative research. In: Schneider, Z. & Whitehead, D. (eds.), Nursing and midwifery research: methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice, 5th ed.,. ch. 8. Elsevier.

28. Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.

29. Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement (2nd ed.). Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.

30. Henning, S. D. (1993). Integration of language, literature and culture: Goals and curricular design. ADFL Bulletin, 24, 22-29.

https://doi.org/10.1632/adfl.24.2.51

31. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. Retrieved from: https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AIED-Book-Excerpt-CCR.pdf on 1.11.24.

32. Jones, C. 2019. Literature, spoken language, spoken skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33. Kahlke, М. R. (2014). Generic qualitative approaches: pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 37-52.

https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300119

34. Kostadinovska-Stojchevska, B. & Shalevska, E. (2024). The Role of AI in Supporting Dyslexic Students in the Language Classroom. DIDACTICA SLOVENICA, 3.

https://doi.org/10.55707/ds-po.v39i3-4.149

35. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

36. Lazar, G. (2009). Literature and language teaching: A Guide For Teachers And Trainers. Cambridge University Press.

37. Leech, G. N., & Short, M. H. (2007). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose, 2nd ed. Routledge.

38. Lightbrown, M. P. & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learnt. Oxford University Press.

39. Maley, A. (1989). Down from the Pedestal: Literature as a resource. In Literature and the Learner: Methodological Approaches. Cambridge: Modern English Publications.

40. Mart, Ç. T. (2017). Literary texts: A means to promote language proficiency of upper-intermediate level EFL students. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 2( 2), 44-55.

https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v2i2.41

41. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173469

42. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

43. Pane, J. F., Griffin, B. A., et al. (2014). Effectiveness of cognitive tutor algebra I at scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(2).

https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713507480

44. Pardede, P. (2011). Using short stories to teach language skills. Journal of English Teaching 1(1), p. -127.

https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v1i1.49

45. Ren, J., & Wang, N. (2018). College English reading instruction in North China Electric Power University: The production-driven approach. English Language Teaching, 11(10), 10-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n10p10

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n10p10

46. Shalevska, E., & Kostadinovska-Stojchevska, B. (2024). Ethics in Times of Advanced AI: Investigating Students' Attitudes Towards ChatGPT and Academic Integrity. International Journal of Education Teacher, 27, p. 72-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20544/teacher.27.08.

https://doi.org/10.20544/teacher.27.08

47. Shalevska , E. (2023). ENGLISH TEACHING JUST GOT AN UPGRADE: HOW AI IS REVOLUTIONIZING TESOL. International Journal of Education Teacher, 25. Retrieved from: https://ijeteacher.com/index.php/ijet/article/view/33 on 1.12.24.

https://doi.org/10.20544/teacher.25.11

48. Shepin, L. G. (2019). Making authentic literary texts relevant, meaningful, and fun in advanced beginnerand intermediate Spanish-language classrooms. Hispania, 102(3 ), 313-318

https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2019.0069

49. Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496589

50. Smilevski, C. (2006). Metodologija na istrazuvanje. Bitola: Pedagoshki Fakultet

51. Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., et al. (2024). Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students' writing. Learning and Instruction, 91, 101894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894

52. Talevski, D. & Shalevska, E. (2023). Exploring EFL Teachers' Perceptions: Integrating Children's Literature in the Language Classroom. International Journal of Education "Teacher", DOI: 10.20544/teacher.26.04.

https://doi.org/10.20544/teacher.26.04

53. Thomas, R. D. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

54. Tošović, B. (1988). Funkcionalni stilovi. Svjetlost.

55. VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), p. 197-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369

56. Verdonk, P. (2002). Stylistics. Oxford University Press.

57. Wang, X., He, X., Wei, J., et al. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence to public health education. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1087174.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1087174

58. Watkins, P. (2017). Teaching and developing reading skills. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024716

59. Watson, G. & Zyngier, S. (eds.). (2007). Literature and stylistics for language learners: Theory and practice. Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230624856

60. Widdowson, G. H. (2013) Stylistics and the Teaching of Literature. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835990

61. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman Handbooks for Language Teachers. London: Longman

62. Zyngier, S. (2001). Towards a Cultural Approach to Stylistics.CAUCE - Revista de Filología y su Didáctica, 24.p. 365-380.

63. Zyngier, S. & Watson, G. (eds.). (2022). Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83609-2

Published

10.05.2026

How to Cite

AI IN LITERATURE TEACHING: EXPLORING THE TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL OF COMMERCIAL AI MODELS. (2026). UKLO Proceedings, 2(1), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.20544/uklop.2026.636

Similar Articles

1-10 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.