TOGETHER FOR BETTER SCIENCE WITH THE MACEDONIAN ASSOCIATION FOR SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20544/uklop.2026.631Keywords:
scientific communication, open science, peer review, research visibility, North MacedoniaAbstract
Introduction: Scientific communication is fundamental to advancing science, increasing visibility, and integrating science into society. In North Macedonia, there is a recognized need for systematic support for scientists and for an institutional framework that promotes quality peer review, transparent knowledge dissemination, and open access.
Results: The Association was founded on June 10, 2025, by distinguished scientific professionals. Its mission is to ensure quality, visibility, and open access to Macedonian scientific output while aligning with international standards. The Association organizes training sessions, peer review workshops, seminars, conferences, and mentorship programs.
Discussion: Through its activities, MASC plays a pivotal role in overcoming structural barriers in Macedonian science, promoting intersectoral and international cooperation, and empowering early-career researchers. It strengthens scientific culture, supports ethical research practices, and increases visibility of national research outputs.
Downloads
References
1. Bentley, Peter, and Svein Kyvik. 2011. "Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries." Public understanding of science 20 (1): 48-63.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510384461
2. Bik, Holly M, and Miriam C Goldstein. 2013. "An introduction to social media for scientists." PLoS biology 11 (4): e1001535.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535
3. Delicado, Ana, Raquel Rego, Cristina Palma Conceição, Inês Pereira, and Luís Junqueira. 2014. "What roles for scientific associations in contemporary science?" Minerva 52 (4): 439-465.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9260-3
4. Illingworth, Sam. 2017. "Delivering effective science communication: advice from a professional science communicator." Seminars in cell & developmental biology.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.04.002
5. Massarani, Luisa, Heather Bray, Marina Joubert, Andy Ridgway, Josepth Roche, Fiona Smyth, Elizabeth Stevenson, Frans van Dam, and Willian Vieira de Abreu. 2023. "The distribution of science communication teaching around the globe." Journal of Science Communication 22 (6).
https://doi.org/10.22323/2.22060205
6. Nielsen, Kristian H. 2013. "Scientific communication and the nature of science." Science & Education 22 (9): 2067-2086.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9475-3
7. Roosendaal, Hans E, and Petrus ATM Geurts. 1997. "Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay." Conference on" Co-operative Research in Information Systems in Physics".
