CLINICAL AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ILIZAROV TREATMENT OF SEVERE NEGLECTED CLUBFOOT: CASE SERIES

Authors

  • Ognen Sheshoski Specialised hospital for orthopaedic surgery and traumatology “Sv. Erazmo” – Ohrid, Republic of North Macedonia; University “St. Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, Republic of North Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20544/hisj.2026.646

Keywords:

Ilizarov method, neglected clubfoot, rigid equinovarus, closed manipulation, ASAMI criteria, adolescent orthopedics

Abstract

Severe residual and neglected rigid clubfoot deformities present significant reconstructive challenges in pediatric and adolescent orthopedics. We report two adolescent patients with severe rigid clubfoot deformity treated with gradual correction using an Ilizarov circular external fixator. This retrospective two-case series included two adolescent patients treated in 2022: a 13-year-old female with congenital bilateral clubfoot and a 17-year-old male with a residual clubfoot deformity associated with spastic cerebral palsy. Both underwent percutaneous Achilles tendon release and staged Ilizarov frame application followed by gradual closed manipulation. Clinical and radiographic correction, treatment duration, functional status, and recurrence during follow-up were assessed. Functional status was categorized using the ASAMI functional criteria, adapted from their original use in Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunion. Plantigrade clinical and radiographic correction was achieved after 60 days of active manipulation in Case 1 and 50 days in Case 2. The frames were maintained in static fixation for 75 and 90 days, respectively, before removal. Case 1 received a Good and Case 2 an Excellent ASAMI functional grade at the one-year and three-year assessments. At the available one- and three-year postoperative examinations, both patients maintained plantigrade weight-bearing without documented recurrent equinus or varus deformity. In these two cases, gradual closed correction with an Ilizarov circular external fixator provided plantigrade alignment and preserved weight-bearing function without extensive bone resection. The findings are descriptive and cannot establish comparative efficacy or generalizability. Larger prospective studies using validated foot-specific and patient-reported outcome measures are needed.

UN SDGs: SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being; SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Brand, R. A. "Clubfoot: Etiology and Treatment-Ignacio V. Ponseti, MD, 1914-." Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, no. 5 (2009): 1121-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0719-8.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0719-8

PMid:19184257

2. Dobbs, M. B., R. Nunley, and P. L. Schoenecker. "Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Clubfeet Treated with Extensive Soft-Tissue Release." J Bone Joint Surg Am 88, no. 5 (May 2006): 986-996. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00114.

https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00114

PMid:16651573

3. Ferreira, R. C., M. T. Costa, G. G. Frizzo, and F. F. da Fonseca Filho. "Correction of Neglected Clubfoot Using the Ilizarov External Fixator." Foot Ankle Int 27, no. 4 (2006): 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602700407.

https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602700407

PMid:16624216

4. Grill, F., and J. Franke. "The Ilizarov Distractor for the Correction of Relapsed or Neglected Clubfoot." J Bone Joint Surg Br 69-B, no. 4 (1987): 593-597. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.69B4.3611163.

https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.69B4.3611163

PMid:3611163

5. Herzenberg, J. E., C. Radler, and N. Bor. "Ponseti Versus Traditional Methods of Casting for Idiopathic Clubfoot." J Pediatr Orthop 22, no. 4 (2002): 517-521.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-200207000-00019

PMid:12131451

6. Ilizarov, G. A. Transosseous Osteosynthesis: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects of the Regeneration and Growth of Tissue. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84388-4

7. Makhdoom, A., P. A. Qureshi, M. F. Jokhio, and K. A. Siddiqui. "Resistant Clubfoot Deformities Managed by Ilizarov Distraction Histogenesis." Indian J Orthop 46, no. 3 (2012): 326-332. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.96385.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.96385

PMid:22719121 PMCid:PMC3377145

8. Muhammed, Z. A. "The Use of the Ilizarov Method in the Correction of Neglected Clubfoot." J Med Chem Sci 6, no. 11 (2023): 2756-2766. https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2023.11.20.

https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2023.11.20

PMCid:PMC9845830

9. Nwet, M., R. Vignesh, W. Khaing, S. San, and Z. W. Ko. "Outcomes of Management of Severe Clubfoot among Children by Ilizarov External Fixator." Malays Orthop J 17, no. 3 (2023): 9-16. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2311.003.

https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2311.003

PMid:38107355 PMCid:PMC10723004

10. Ponseti, I. V. Congenital Clubfoot: Fundamentals of Treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

11. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. Geneva: WHO, 2018.

Downloads

Published

29-10-2026

How to Cite

Sheshoski , Ognen. 2026. “CLINICAL AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ILIZAROV TREATMENT OF SEVERE NEGLECTED CLUBFOOT: CASE SERIES”. Horizons - International Scientific Journal 3 (1): 80-91. https://doi.org/10.20544/hisj.2026.646.