APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS OF ALBANIA, KOSOVO AND NORTH MACEDONIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20544/hisj.2025.593Keywords:
Judicial System, Legitimization, Procedural Deadlines, Juridical ReviewAbstract
As essential components of the rule of law, the rights to due process and legal certainty play a key role in guaranteeing justice. This study aims to analyze the function, importance and role of recourse to the Supreme Court as a legal tool. The research problem addressed is to what extent recourse fulfills its function in protecting the rights of individuals, unifying judicial practice and strengthening legal certainty. The objectives of the study include analyzing the legal framework governing recourse, examining judicial practice, and identifying implementation gaps. A doctrinal research approach was used through the analysis of laws, court decisions and scientific literature. The findings show that although recourse offers a higher level of judicial protection, it is often hampered by a selective approach, procedural delays and inconsistencies in the interpretation of the law. The study concludes that, to guarantee a functional, efficient and reliable judicial system, it is necessary to strengthen the role of the Supreme Court and to improve procedural legislation, thereby making recourse an essential instrument for the protection of fundamental human rights.
Downloads
References
1. Benjamin, Cardozo. 2006. Natyra e procesit gjyqësor [The Nature of the Judicial Process]. Tirana: Apollonia Press.
2. Brati, A. 2008. Kodi i Procedurës Civile [Civil Procedure Code]. Tirana: Dudaj Press.
3. Cabej, Lorena. 2022. Risitë e gjykimit në Gjykatën e Lartë me Ligjin nr. 44/2021 [Innovations in Supreme Court Proceedings under Law No. 44/2021]. Tirana: School of Magistrates.
4. Cadiet, Loïc. 2011. "Introduction to the French Civil Justice System and Civil Procedural Law." Ritsumeikan Law Review 28. https://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/cg/law/lex/rlr28/CADIET3.pdf.
5. Cappelletti, Mauro. 1972. "Juridical Review in the Contemporary World." Fordham Law Review 40, no. 4: 117. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/.
6. Constitutional Court of Albania. 2008. "Final Decisions." https://www.gjk.gov.al/web/Vendime_perfundimtare_100_1.php.
7. Euralius. 2021. Euralius Report. Tirana. https://www.euralius.eu/index.php/en/gallery/30-euralius-reports.
8. Law No. 03/L-006 për Procedurën Kontestimore [Law on Contested Procedure]. Official Gazette of the Republic of Kosovo. https://gzk.rks-gov.net/.
9. Law Gratis. 2024. Kodi i Procedurës Civile në Republikën e Maqedonisë së Veriut [Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of North Macedonia]. https://www.lawgratis.com/blog-detail/civil-procedure-code-at-north-macedonia.
10. Maho, B., and A. Belishta. 2014. "Rëndësia që mbartin vendimet e kolegjit penal dhe civil të Gjykatës së Lartë" ["The Importance of Decisions of the Criminal and Civil Chambers of the Supreme Court"]. Jus & Justicia 9: 7. https://uet.edu.al/jus-justicia/.
11. Mandro, Arta. 2007. E drejta romake [Roman Law]. Tirana: Emal Press.
12. Qendra e Botimeve Zyrtare. 2014. Kodi i Procedurës Civile i Republikës së Shqipërisë [Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Albania]. https://www.qbz.gov.al/.
13. Qendra e Botimeve Zyrtare. 2020. Vendim njësues i Gjykatës së Lartë të Shqipërisë [Unifying Decision of the Supreme Court of Albania]. Tirana: AlbJuris Press.
14. Qerimi, Islam. 2020. Disa karakteristika të sistemit juridik anglez me theks të veçantë tek e drejta e procedurës penale [Some Characteristics of the English Legal System with Special Emphasis on Criminal Procedure Law]. Prishtina: Mrekulli Press.
15. Slapper, Gary, and David Kelly. 2024. The English Legal System. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.routledge.com/Slapper-and-Kellys-The-English-Legal-System/Kelly/p/book/9781032505220.
16. Supreme Court of Albania. 2001. "Unifying Decisions." https://www.gjykataelarte.gov.al/sq/vendime-unifikuese-ne-vite.
17. Zogaj, Albert. 2019. Manual për zbatim të procedurës kontestimore [Manual for the Application of Contested Procedure]. Prishtina: Blendi Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




